Cache Valley Watershed Area

By Paul Wirth

CEE 6440 GIS in Watershed

 

Data Collection

Experience Gained from Project

Problems with Data

Conclusion

References

 

Introduction

Over the past few years there has been an increasing interest for many people that want to bring data collected over Cache Valley together and make it easily accessible to the general public through the Internet. The data includes but is not just limited to the Watersheds of Cache Valley (a portion of the Bear River Watershed). Some people are concerned about the projected growth of the valley, some about water quality, some about the wildlife in the valley and surrounding ecological sensitive areas, and some about fish habitat.

To address these concerns and others David Chandler [1] from the Department of Plants, Soils, and Biometeorology at Utah State University (USU) held a meeting Friday, November 2, 2001. His idea is to establish a database for Cache Valley that would focus on the watersheds of Valley. He soon found out that many people had a lot of research done on many other aspects of the Valley not at first thought of.

At the meeting I took on the task of explaining to the attendees that I would like to collect the data and research that existed and turn that data over to Hadi Jaafer [2], a Ph.D Student in Irrigation Engineering at USU, to put it into the computer for public interactive viewing on a Internet Map Server (IMS) for ArcView maps (ArcIMS).

 

 

Data Collecting

During the meeting it seemed that many people were excited about sharing data and ideas about Cache Valley. Before the meeting adjourned I told those who were present that I would send out an email to discuss my project in more detail, what I wanted to do and when we could meet so I could start collecting and assembling the data that would be useful to my project.

On November 4th, 2001 I sent out that email to all the people that wanted to participate and contribute to this project. I received many responses and began to set up times and dates to meet with individuals that responded to my email.

The first meeting was with Richard Toth [3] from the Department of Forest Resources at USU who expressed a great deal of interest in the Cub River watershed. He said that he had done a project on the Cub River Watershed and I could have that data but it was stored on a CD in ArcView format and he didn’t have it. He did go on to explain why the Cub River should be the greatest river concern in the Cache Valley.  The reason for this is because: 1) the Cub River transverses the State of Utah and Idaho, 2) it is the only free flowing river in Cache Valley, and 3) increased development of the areas around the Cub River using septic systems that have been proven in the past to pollute ground water associated to streams and rivers over time. The latter affecting the water quality that affects the fish and other organism that depend on the Cub River Watershed.

I met next with Wayne Wurtsbaugh [4], from the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife at USU who said that he had a lot of limnolgical data for the Logan River, Little Bear River and the Hyrum Reservoir. It was yearly data but was not very organized. I did look at the data he collected this year but I politely declined to take the data because I wouldn’t be able to compare year to year data and it didn’t pertain to what I was trying to accomplish with this project.

Professor Phaedra Budy [5], from the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife at USU, had a lot of information. She is doing a lot of research on the fish health of the Watersheds of Cache Valley. This research is ongoing and because she is new at Utah State University she didn’t have much data that was very organized that she could give me but she did talk to me about the fish population of the Logan River. It seems that the Salmon and Trout populations are definitely increasing in the Logan River watershed over the past years and that the water quality has improved. She is optimistic about these results so far but she said that a disease that is very harmful to fish in Utah called Whirling disease could play a significant role in the health of the fish population in Cache Valley for decades to come if it gets well established here in the Valley.

I was getting pretty discouraged by this time because I hadn’t been able to collect any substantial amount of useable data for my project so I started contacting other people that might be able to help me. It occurred to me that that maybe the person involved in gathering the GIS data for Logan would be of help. He never returned my phone calls or he wasn’t there. My next action was to call some friends that are now working on Master Degrees and doing some GIS research. In the mean time I was able to secure some responses to my emails and set up some times to visit with them.

One of the initial appointments that were quite useful was with Karen Hanna [6] from the Landscape and Environmental Planning Department at USU. We talked for a few minutes. She said that she had a lot of coverages, shape files and digital images on the Cache Valley but that she didn’t have them on CD’s. She did explain to me that some of the info could be downloaded from the server in the Natural Resources building where she teaches. This was useful and I went and did that so I could bring that data over to the Geomatic computer lab (GCL) and upload it onto my drive.

Later that day I met with Nancy Mesner [7] from the College of Natural Resources (USU). She was not at the meeting so I filled her in on what I wanted to accomplish with my project. She was very helpful and was able to supply me with data from the Little Bear River and the rest of the Bear River Watershed. In the process of our conversation she was also able to supply me with the CD of the Cub River research that Richard Toth thought was lost. Nancy was a great help by supplying me with a lot of data. Unfortunately I wasn’t able to have the data for long because other people also needed to use it for research and monitoring purposes.  

My next contact was with Barbara Daniels [8] from a private organization called Monitoring Utah Wetlands. Her organization monitors wildlife, vegetation and water quality from the Great Salt Lake to the Cache Valley. She had many sites that gathered data in Cache Valley that I was interested in so I could put it into my project. She supplied the data but she said that Brain Nicholson from United States Department of Water Resources knew the places where the data was collect.

            I met with Mr. Nicholson [9], from the Utah Department of Wildlife Resources, and he was able to supply me with digital images and points where the data was collected in GIS form. This will make it easier to combine the two pieces of data onto my database in the CEE lab.

 

The last person I talked to about gathering data was Chris Mcginty[10], a Masters Student from the Geography and Earth Resources Department at USU that had some information on Cache Valley in GIS format. He let me look at some of it and he said where it was and how I could get it. Most of the data that he was able to show me was coverages and a few digital photos. It turns out that this information was quite useful in helping me out on my data collection for my project.

Experience Gained from this Project

In the ever continuing effort of collecting data for this project I encountered many obstacles that needed to be overcome in order to make the data useable in the CEE lab that uses the Windows operating system. The many problems encountered were:  1) reading files that couldn’t be read in the CEE lab, 2) transferring data from a UNIX system to a Windows based operating system, and 3) copying data.

The first thing that I did before I started collecting data was to set up a file transfer protocol (FTP) account with Professor Tarboton [11] in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at USU. He explained it to me but I really didn’t catch on until I got some data emailed to me at home in Quatro Pro format. I couldn’t open it at home so I copied it to an ftp file in my account at school. At school the GCL didn’t have Quatro Pro so I had to download the ftp Quatro Pro file onto a Natural Resource lab computer, open it as a Quatro Pro file, save it as a Excel file and copy it to my ftp file so I could use it in the CEE lab.

The next problem that I encountered was how to get UNIX operating system files into readable Windows files. I tried to transfer files at first by downloading the UNIX files onto a disk and then just putting the disk into the GCL computers and uploading. Needless to say it didn’t work. I asked some friends and they said that there is program called Secure Shell that will do that. A friend of mine let me borrow the program so I could transfer files that I needed for my project from the UNIX system to the Windows system in the GCL. The secure shell program made it possible to transfer data with ease from the UNIX operating system to the Windows operating system with no big loss of data.

Now that transferring data could be done with ease with almost any kind of  data I start downloading and copying so I could have the data on my I drive in the GCL. As I finished doing this for a considerable amount of data I went into Arc/GIS to import it and play with it a little. Much to my surprise some coverages, shapefiles and images didn’t copy over. I kept getting errors when I tried to open them. After much suffering I started downloading or copying one file at a time and opening them in Arc/GIS to see if it worked. It seems that when I was downloading multiple files sometimes they got corrupted and I couldn’t open them so I downloaded one file at a time which gave me a readable file almost 100% of the time in Arc/GIS.

After sorting all the data that  was going to use I had to convert every thing I had into shapefiles so that the Internet Map Server could read the files. This was a long and tedious process that took many hours but was a time saver for my partner Hadi Jaafer. He could now import the data in shapefiles into the IMS and start to create interactive maps on the internet.

 

 

 

Problems with Data

Not all the data was very useful and in fact some of the data was damaged and couldn’t be opened. In those cases I didn’t consider fixing the problem because it wasn’t my data. For example the data on the CD for the Cub River that Richard Toth created and that Nancy Mesner gave me was damaged and some of the data and information that was available on the CD could not be used.

Another problem that arose was that data was not gathered with GPS points. This can best be illustrated by the image below (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

 

The problem with the data in Figure 1 is the water quality data was not Georeferenced with points on the ground where it was collected. The points were just placed on the ArcView map that had predefined coordinates so when I changed the map projections the points ended up in some other place on the map or even disappeared.

A common problem with the data I collected is that many features were not labeled like in the figure below (Figure 2). In this case the name of the Watershed and the area of the Watershed were missing. This created a problem that could remedied with some time, but that wasn’t part of my project.

 

 

 

Figure 2.

The last problem that I would like to talk about happened in the Little Bear River Watershed and was similar to the same one we encountered with Logan River Watershed. A piece of that Watershed got left out because the DEM data said that the water flowed to the Cub River Watershed in the North located in Figure 2 above.

A research project that was done on the Little Bear River Watershed didn’t include a small little area on the bottom of the map (Figure 3). Now Unlike the Logan River Watershed this little area circled below is hard to access and see if the DEM is correct or not. This clarification should be done at a future date by verifying this area on the ground as to which way it flows.

Figure 3.

Conclusion

This project is so huge and the amount of data so enormous that I have just scratched the surface. Not all the data was useful and some of it didn’t make any sense. Only a small portion of it was passed on to Mr. Jaafer so he could put it on IMS. There is still a lot of data out there that could be collected and formed into something that made some sense if somebody wanted to make this into a Masters Project.

 

 

 


References

 

 

 

  1. Chandler, David. Personal contact.  02 November 2001.
  2. Jaafer, Hadi. Personal contact and Project partner. Fall Semester 2001.
  3. Toth, Richard. Personal interview. 06 November 2001.
  4. Wurtsbaugh, Wayne. Personal interview. 06 November 2001.
  5. Phaedra, Budy. Personal interview. 07 November 2001.
  6. Hanna, Karen. Personal interview. 08 November 2001.
  7. Mesner, Nancy. Personal interview. 08 November 2001.
  8. Daniels, Barbara. Telephone interview. 07 November 2001.
  9. Nicholson, Brain. Personal interview. 08 November 2001.
  10. Mcginty, Chris. Personal interview. 13 November 2001.
  11. Tarboton, David. Personal contact. 06 November 2001.